Uber and Lyft Sexual Assault Litigation: MDL and State Court Landscape

A Strategic White Paper from Blue Sky Legal

A disturbing trend has shadowed the rapid growth of rideshare companies like Uber and Lyft: thousands of allegations of sexual assault by drivers. This has led to an explosion of litigation, culminating in a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) and numerous parallel state court actions. This white paper outlines the scope of the claims, the status of the MDL, state-level strategies, and opportunities for law firms and litigation funders. We conclude with how Blue Sky Legal can support firms through performance-based plaintiff acquisition.

The Scope of Rideshare Sexual Assault Allegations

  • Uber’s own safety reports cite nearly 6,000 incidents of sexual assault in 2017–2018, with similar reports for 2019–2020.
  • Lyft has disclosed about 5,000 complaints annually.
  • Allegations include rape, groping, kidnapping, and other assaults.
  • Plaintiffs allege Uber and Lyft failed in screening, training, oversight, and response to complaints.
  • Many cases stem from systemic issues, not isolated incidents.

    Federal MDL: In re Uber Technologies, Inc. Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation (Case No. 4:23-md-03076)

    • Centralized in the Northern District of California under Judge Charles R. Breyer.
    • Over 2,000 cases consolidated, with thousands of additional plaintiffs expected.
    • Claims include negligence, product liability, breach of contract, and failure to warn.
    • Product liability theory treats the app as a dangerous consumer product.
    • Breach of contract includes allegations related to the “Safe Rides Fee.”
    • The Ninth Circuit denied Uber’s efforts to enforce click-wrap non-consolidation clauses in March 2025.
    • First bellwether trials expected in December 2025.

    State Court Strategies

    • Dozens of Uber sexual assault cases are proceeding in California JCCP 5188.
    • Other significant venues include Texas, New York, and Illinois.
    • Lyft cases have not been centralized into an MDL but are active in many state courts.
    • Plaintiffs often sue both the company and the driver to preserve state jurisdiction.
    • States vary on key doctrines: common carrier liability, punitive damages caps, and consumer protection laws.
    • California and New York offer plaintiff-friendly environments.

    Strategic Considerations: MDL vs. State Court

    Federal MDL Pros:

    • Shared discovery
    • Coordinated litigation
    • Economies of scale
    • Potential global settlement

    Federal MDL Cons:

    • Slower timeline
    • Shared control with lead counsel
    • Standardized settlement tiers may cap outlier case value

    State Court Pros:

    • More strategic control
    • Faster local dockets
    • Favorable local laws and juries

    State Court Cons:

    • Fewer shared resources
    • Risk of isolation or aggressive defense tactics

      Scale of Opportunity

      • Uber and Lyft could face billions in liability.
      • Settlement estimates range from $10,000 to $500,000+ per claim, with exceptional cases potentially exceeding $1 million.
      • Public sentiment and media attention continue to drive awareness and new filings.
      • Advocacy groups, regulators, and policymakers are pushing for reform.

      Emerging Trends

      • Product liability and common carrier theories are gaining traction.
      • Coordinated strategies between MDL and state court plaintiffs.
      • Litigation driving safety changes (e.g., audio recording, PIN verification).
      • Increasing pressure on insurance carriers and platform responsibility.
      • Legislative attention may drive broader reforms.

      Blue Sky Legal: Your Strategic Partner in Rideshare Assault Litigation

      Blue Sky Legal is already helping law firms acquire Uber and Lyft sexual assault plaintiffs at a performance-based cost of $3,600 to $4,800, depending on the complexity of the criteria. We deliver signed retainers at a targeted price range, helping law firms enter or scale into this litigation with predictable, high-quality case acquisition.

      Whether your strategy is MDL, state court, or both, we can align targeting and screening to your needs. Our campaigns are compliance-ready, high-performing, and built with transparency. For litigation funders and law firms looking to participate in a landmark mass tort, we offer the volume and vetting needed to build value from day one.

      Contact us to learn more: https://blueskylegal.com/contact-us/

      Contact Us

      Ready to Grow Your Firm with Blue Sky Legal?

      From attracting new clients to ensuring every lead is qualified and signed, our turn-key client acquisition and intake solutions are designed to help your firm scale effectively. Contact us today to learn more.